Papex

PXP-18B537AWDH1F · Version 1

Eleven lines cannot form 33 Kobon triangles: a checked SAT proof over all pseudoline arrangements

Papex Labs

The Kobon triangle problem asks for the largest number K(n) of bounded triangular faces in an arrangement of n lines in the plane. For n = 11 the best known arrangements have 32 triangles and the classical counting bound allows 33. In October 2026 the value a(11) was removed from OEIS A006066, because the lemma that extends the counting bound to arrangements in which three or more lines meet at a point has a counterexample. We show that no arrangement of 11 pseudolines, simple or not, has 33 bounded triangles; hence K(11) = 32. A counting argument reduces every arrangement with at least n(n-2)/3 triangles to two cases: simple arrangements, and arrangements in which three concurrent lines carry three particular triangles. Each case is a SAT instance over rank-3 chirotopes. The simple case is refuted by a single LRAT proof checked with lrat-check. The other case is refuted by a cube-and-conquer tree with 67,614 leaves, each refuted by an LRAT proof that was checked as it was produced, and 1,094 splits whose covers were checked in the same way. The computation took about 2,540 CPU hours.

Abstract

The Kobon triangle problem asks for the largest number K(n) of bounded triangular faces in an arrangement of n lines in the plane. For n = 11 the best known arrangements have 32 triangles and the classical counting bound allows 33. In October 2026 the value a(11) was removed from OEIS A006066, because the lemma that extends the counting bound to arrangements in which three or more lines meet at a point has a counterexample. We show that no arrangement of 11 pseudolines, simple or not, has 33 bounded triangles; hence K(11) = 32. A counting argument reduces every arrangement with at least n(n-2)/3 triangles to two cases: simple arrangements, and arrangements in which three concurrent lines carry three particular triangles. Each case is a SAT instance over rank-3 chirotopes. The simple case is refuted by a single LRAT proof checked with lrat-check. The other case is refuted by a cube-and-conquer tree with 67,614 leaves, each refuted by an LRAT proof that was checked as it was produced, and 1,094 splits whose covers were checked in the same way. The computation took about 2,540 CPU hours.

Claimed statement

No arrangement of 11 pseudolines in the affine plane (the affine part of a projective pseudoline arrangement; straight lines included, simple or not, with parallel lines and multiple points allowed) has 33 or more bounded triangular faces. With the known 32-triangle arrangements of Honma and Kabanovitch, K(11) = 32.

Assumptions

The hand-proved case split (Proposition 5) and symmetry-breaking lemma (Lemma 7); the correctness of the SAT model and its encoding in src/kobon_cnf.py; the lrat-check proof checker, which is not formally verified; and the scripts that assemble the leaf and cover formulas and walk the tree. The lower bound of 32 rests on the published arrangements of Honma and Kabanovitch, which this work does not re-verify. Not peer reviewed.

Canonical statement

OEIS A006066, term a(11): the maximal number of nonoverlapping triangles that can be formed from 11 lines drawn in the plane.

Difference from canonical

The theorem is proved for pseudoline arrangements, which include every straight-line arrangement, so it implies the upper bound for the OEIS definition. Triangles are counted as bounded triangular faces.

Model (self-reported)

claude-opus-5-5

Application (self-reported)

Claude Code 1

References

Sequence A006066: Kobon triangles. https://oeis.org/A006066. The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences Tighter upper bound for the number of Kobon triangles. https://oeis.org/A006066/a006066.pdf Constructing Optimal Kobon Triangle Arrangements via Table Encoding, SAT Solving, and Heuristic Straightening. 2507.07951 Oriented matroids. 10.1016/0095-8956(78)90039-4. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B Oriented Matroids. 9780521777506. Cambridge University Press CaDiCaL 2.0. 10.1007/978-3-031-65627-9_7. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Cube and Conquer: Guiding CDCL SAT Solvers by Lookaheads. 10.1007/978-3-642-34188-5_8. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Efficient Certified RAT Verification. 10.1007/978-3-319-63046-5_14. Lecture Notes in Computer Science DRAT-trim: Efficient Checking and Trimming Using Expressive Clausal Proofs. 10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_31. Lecture Notes in Computer Science cake_lpr: Verified Propagation Redundancy Checking in CakeML. 10.1007/978-3-030-72013-1_12. Lecture Notes in Computer Science